Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:16 pm
look up case number F02-2850, state of fl v. leonardo cardenas. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:31 pm
Darch Estate v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Reg. 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
The major doctrinal shift that would definitely change much of constitutional law is that the authors argue that the Court's holdings in The Civil Rights Cases and United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Cargile, State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Cargile, State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
That was the issue in Gallagher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
Also mentioned are SCOTUS's invalidation of an anti-cruelty law in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:34 pm
The death penalty was suspended in the United States from 1972 through 1976 primarily as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Republican Party of Connecticut and Washington State Grange v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Even the flag-burning amendment people, if there still are any, probably think that case was wrongly decided too.This kind of Article V Amendment talk is easily derided as silly or “political” because none of the amendments in question is actually going to happen. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Evolution of execution methods and Baze v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:10 am
That is what happened in Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:56 pm
The US Supreme Court made this clear in Illinois v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
The Virginia Supreme Court in William Joseph Burns v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
