Search for: "State v. Duke"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
Dukes has “lived up to the hype,” as it has already been cited by lower courts 260 times. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:25 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
In 1970, the US Supreme Court, in Griggs v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Dukes). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
Dukes, et al., AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:02 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp., No. 178 (Nov. 24, 2009). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:37 am
Posted by Greg MersolIn Dukes v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am
That decision offered an interesting discussion of choice of law, and of the notion of commonality after Dukes v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:35 am
Ross, BP v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:43 am
Under executive order of March 29th 1989 of unelected Grand Duke Jean, the right to correspondence of detainees is severely restricted. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:43 am
Under executive order of March 29th 1989 of unelected Grand Duke Jean, the right to correspondence of detainees is severely restricted. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:27 am
Dukes. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
LG Display Co., No. 11-255 (4th Cir.): These cases involve whether a lawsuit filed by a state attorney general qualifies as a “mass action” under CAFA and issues regarding minimal diversity under CAFA where a state is a plaintiff. [read post]
