Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 10,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2020, 1:14 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlLa Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Reservation v. [read post]
In challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act, court will weigh the rights of states and the role of race
8 Nov 2022, 11:56 am
There are four main issues at the heart of the dispute. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Since Maine v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
I blogged here about United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court decision of Anderson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The Supreme Court held 5 to 4 today in Altria Group, Inc, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:19 pm
In New York State Department of Correctional Services v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Under the circumstances of the main proceedings that effect is to be presumed unless the offer concerns a single item or few items offered by a seller clearly not acting in the course of trade [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
LSUC and Alberta (Education) v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:42 am
Customary international law, however, does not require that all States have expressly consented to these rules. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 2:58 pm
Sattgast (Tribal Sovereignty; State Taxation) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Rodgers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
The proposal form stated that the premises were protected by an automatic sprinkler system and the policy itself contained a term to the effect that the policy would be cancelled if there was a material change in the facts stated in the proposal form. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Thursday: New York State Pistol & Rifle Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 pm
" Brief for the United States in Opposition, Stevenson v. [read post]
