Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 44,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:13 am
Dwyer, 448 Mass. 122 (2006) and Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:24 am
Similarly, the worth of the evidence provided by an e-record cannot be assessed without evidence as to the state of records management of the ERMS in which the e-record is stored. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:05 am
Thind Revisited, which appears in the Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives 7 (2015): 1-42.This article reexamines the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:20 pm
EFF – “Americans have the right to expect that digital records of their daily travels—when they left home, where they went, and how long they stayed—is private information, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) said in an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:00 am
"* New York State Senate Republican Campaign Committee, Petitioner v Commission To Investigate Public Corruption, Respondent, Supreme Court, New York County, Index Number 159965/2013. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
The post VINCE’S CRAB HOUSE, INC., ET AL. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
See VOOM HD Holdings LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:40 am
In Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
(see Robin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
United States (police improperly extended traffic stop to conduct dog sniff of car). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:08 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
–Garnier v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
By Dennis Crouch In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 12:52 pm
In the recent case of Meehan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
