Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 10:59 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a royalty award in Gaylord v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
 He focuses rightly on the seminal case of American Waltham Watch Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am by Darren Olivier
Ryan Tucker, and advocate Lisa Oken  set out the ASA development in their summary as follows:"THE NEXT STAGE – TAKING IT TO THE ADVERTISING STANDARDS AUTHORITY (“ASA”)In a ruling handed down by the ASA Directorate on 3 February 2015 (M-Systems Group v Cochrane Steel Products; Case number 2014-1859F), the next stage of the saga between the parties was decided. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 11:55 am
… The duty and standard of care could change from 1968 to 2004 in the context of operating the steel works. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm by Walter Olson
In November I wrote in Jurist on a Third Circuit panel’s refusal to order that sports great Jim Thorpe be disinterred and reburied under provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); in response, Elizabeth Varner, Diane Penneys Edelman and Leila Amineddoleh of the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation argue that the panel could have based its result on specific language in the statute rather than via the roundabout path it did take… [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
 The Alliance was successful in its PAIA application against ArcelorMittal, a private body, for information relating to the company’s operational and strategic approach to the protection of the environment into the areas where it operates steel plants. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:06 am by Rebecca Jeschke
"EFF is grateful for the support of the Adams Charitable Foundation," said EFF Executive Director Shari Steele. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
The construction of new west-bound lanes of a bridge project by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) “required the driving of steel beams, called piles, down 180–200 feet to bedrock” to support the new bridge. [read post]