Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 1361 - 1380 of 21,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  He harshly derides as “fabricated,” “incoheren[t],” “magic” and a “contrivance” a test that asks “whether: (1) ‘precluding district court jurisdiction’ would ‘foreclose all meaningful judicial review’; (2) the plaintiff ’s claims are ‘wholly collateral’ to the statutory review scheme; and (3) the claims are ‘outside the agency’s expertise. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  He harshly derides as “fabricated,” “incoheren[t],” “magic” and a “contrivance” a test that asks “whether: (1) ‘precluding district court jurisdiction’ would ‘foreclose all meaningful judicial review’; (2) the plaintiff ’s claims are ‘wholly collateral’ to the statutory review scheme; and (3) the claims are ‘outside the agency’s expertise. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Trump could test even the most hard-bitten veterans of politics and destroy reputations. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although plaintiff's score on the New York State Professional Careers Test was higher than those of the selected candidates, state employers are not required to select the highest scoring individual, and factors outside of performance on the test may be taken into consideration in making civil service appointments (see Matter of Cassidy v Municipal Civ. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although plaintiff's score on the New York State Professional Careers Test was higher than those of the selected candidates, state employers are not required to select the highest scoring individual, and factors outside of performance on the test may be taken into consideration in making civil service appointments (see Matter of Cassidy v Municipal Civ. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm by Morgan Cloud
Unsurprisingly, Yegiazaryan urges the Supreme Court to adopt this test. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:07 am by Jordan Duenckel
Celgene, the original plaintiff, brought this Hatch-Waxman suit, asserting that Sandoz’s generic product would infringe the ’638 and ’101 patents. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As a general rule, the SOL starts to run "when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
Normally, Kavanaugh explained, that occurs when a plaintiff has a “complete and present cause of action” – that is, when the plaintiff can actually file a lawsuit and obtain relief. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am by Florian Mueller
Microsoft now has three attack vectors: The starting point of the analysis is whether the plaintiffs (the "gamers", though the lawyers are the real plaintiffs and now appear to be supported by Sony in whatever ways) have standing. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am by Andreas Kaltsounis and Andrew Epstein
But the act’s private right of action incentivizes the plaintiffs’ bar to test expansive interpretations, creating risk for any “regulated entity” that interprets the provisions too narrowly. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am by Andreas Kaltsounis and Andrew Epstein
But the act’s private right of action incentivizes the plaintiffs’ bar to test expansive interpretations, creating risk for any “regulated entity” that interprets the provisions too narrowly. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 6:52 am by Jacob Wirz
There’s a common thread running throughout many of the press reports, plaintiffs’ briefs, and even critiques discussing the major questions doctrine: the idea that the doctrine applies whenever an agency action has “vast economic and political significance. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 6:52 am by Jacob Wirz
There’s a common thread running throughout many of the press reports, plaintiffs’ briefs, and even critiques discussing the major questions doctrine: the idea that the doctrine applies whenever an agency action has “vast economic and political significance. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Eugene Volokh
UPDATE: Thanks to Alwin (@TheButterZone), I learned that the Maryland intermediate appellate court reached the opposite result for the same plaintiff, Doe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
And no one is arguing that states must apply an objective test. [read post]