Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
While venue does not go to culpability — theft of trade secrets is wrong, whether done in Florida or Alabama — the same is true of jurisdictional elements which require no intent yet must be found by the jury. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Unfortunately, the RMSE does not attempt to quantify or define “substantial. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Marshal Service, testified that he obtained certified copies of Mathis's sex offender registration forms from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and the Government introduced the forms into evidence.U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:01 am
Similarly, filing ethics complaints does not make one an expert on the inner workings of the OCE, just as filing an ethics complaint with the Florida Bar does not qualify one to offer opinions on how the claims are evaluated and advanced. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
at 46.While Brown did not close the door for all consent arguments under all statutes, “at least in cases brought by state residents,” it provides a roadmap for defeating post-Bauman jurisdiction by consent arguments in other states where the registration statute does not conclusively reach that result.Particularly in light of Brown – but we were obviously working on this anyway − we’ve decided that Bauman is important enough to create a new general… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
WAMSER, and FLORIDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., Appellants, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 12:54 pm
But what does this mean, exactly? [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 pm
SeeFussman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
White v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:15 am
White v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 8:08 am
The Plaintiff’s Mother Dies While Under the Care of the Defendants The plaintiff in the case of Moon v. [read post]
WHEN A REQUEST FOR EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE TREATED AS A CLAIM UNDER THE CONTRACT DISPUTES ACT
24 Jul 2022, 6:42 am
Zafer Construction Company v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Fritts held that a robbery conviction under the Florida statute is a violent felony under the elements of ACCA (684 Fed.Appx. 870). [read post]
IN: Failure to file affidavit before search warrant is executed in violation of statute voids search
2 Mar 2007, 5:02 am
" See, e.g., Florida v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:59 am
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
Conclusion Although not applied or expressly approved, the Supreme Court does note the Court of Appeal’s decision in Paulsson v. [read post]
