Search for: "U.S. v. Winn*" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Electors appointed prior to the completion of vote counting, and the resolution of any challenges, cannot qualify for the Electoral Count Act’s “safe harbor” provision which guarantees that their votes will be accepted And premature appointments by Republican-controlled legislatures will violate state law, let alone federal law and pertinent provisions of the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2017, 12:07 am by Georgina Hey (AU)
This situation is not dissimilar to the events in Winnebago Industries, Inc. v Knott Investments Pty Ltd. [read post]
18 May 2017, 12:07 am by Georgina Hey (AU)
This situation is not dissimilar to the events in Winnebago Industries, Inc. v Knott Investments Pty Ltd. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm by Rick Hasen
In 2007, before Citizens United, the Supreme Court decided FEC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law How might a new U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
However, he is wrong to believe that the best way to achieve these goals is to impose costly mandates and taxpayer-funded subsidies to pick energy winners and losers. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]