Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 1361 - 1380
of 8,925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
Removal from the United States, however, is not included as a penalty. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Constitution, the charter under which we all live here in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:43 pm
It includes findings of two Regional Conferences held in partnership with the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean and the African Union Commission. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that prohibited California from enforcing AB 51, which was signed into law in 2019 (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
The case has been appealed to United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am
OHCHR: Human Rights Council The UN Human Rights Council Working Group on discrimination against women and girls issued a 2016 report on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice on its mission to the United States of America in which it expressed regret that American women have “seen their rights to sexual and reproductive health significantly eroded…” (para. 28) and noted that “ever-increasing barriers are being created… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
”The United States Supreme Court that in making this complex determination the law can only take jurors so far. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 1:02 am
So the fight is just beginning, and I bet any day of the week on the women of the United States of America. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
In the instant case, the Court of Appeal held that there was no material evidence placed before the court to establish the change of name of the plaintiff-appellant company, and the resolution for change of name in Brazil that was provided before the court was deemed insufficient.[3] In Edicomsa International Inc and Associates v CITEC International Estates Ltd,[4] the plaintiff-appellant was a foreign company incorporated in the United States of America. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am
The Bush administration feared that the United States could then be asked to intervene against domestic terrorist attacks in NATO treaty states in the future. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
The case is captioned United States of America ex rel. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
In addition, access to counsel was far more difficult from Mexico than it is in the United States, where accessing counsel is difficult enough. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
