Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
United States v. 39 Cases, 192 F. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
” Four states – Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and South Carolina – next assert that they have standing because the program will reduce their tax revenues. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:20 pm
District Court for the District of South Carolina denied al-Marri's habeas petition in August 2006. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
District Court in South Carolina. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
Early American custom During the nineteenth century, the South was the gun control center of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Should the Confederate flag be allowed to fly over the South Carolina state capitol? [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
See, The United States Department of Justice Manual §9-105.000. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:59 pm
Based on a government document filed in a federal court in South Carolina at the end of April in a separate case filed by Al-Marri, his attorneys contended Wednesday that his designation as an enemy was “illegal because it was for the illegitimate purpose of interrogation” — a violation of the Supreme Court’s 2004 ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:40 am
His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [1] Lendenmann v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Justice White concurring and dissenting in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am
In fact if you look in the South Carolina Code of Laws which mandates what a solicitor’s job is we can’t be like a normal attorney is. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D North Carolina: System component used to practice claimed method is not an ‘unpatented article’ for purposes of false marking: Harrington v. [read post]
