Search for: "University Oral " Results 1361 - 1380 of 6,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Mosvick, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Mississippi, has posted Courtroom Wars: Pennsylvania Judges and Popular Constitutional Discourse in the Civil War North, which appears in the Faulkner Law Review 8 (2017): 269-348 (2017):In November 1863, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction in the case of Kneedler v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:44 am by Christine Corcos
Mosvick, University of Mississippi School of Law, has published Courtroom Wars: Pennsylvania Judges and Popular Constitutional Discourse in the Civil War North at 8 Faulkner L. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
Tempnology, LLC on Tuesday will offer post-oral argument reflections this Wednesday at the American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Over at Jotwell, Joanna Grisinger, Northwestern University, has posted Did Public Interest Lawyers Undermine the New Deal Order? [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Friedman, Stanford Law School, for receiving the University of Chicago’s Alumni Professional Achievement Award.Paul D. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm by Dan Ernst
Davis Distinguished Professor at the University of Arkansas School of Law, will provide a historical overview. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:30 pm by Tom Kosakowski
 For this post fluency in written and oral English and French is required, knowledge of one of the other official languages of the UN Secretariat is desirable. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 11:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  After the oral argument, it seems at least probable that Pom will prevail on a fairly straightforward theory that the FDA regulations provide a floor and not a ceiling. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:03 am by Staci Zaretsky
* Two women will be making their oral argument debuts before the Supreme Court this week. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In oral argument on the Trump matter, Judge Friedland asked: “Are you arguing, then, that the president’s decision in that regard is unreviewable? [read post]