Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff in the instant case is seeking to subpoena information that he may be able to use as evidence in support of his claim against the defendant, in other words, for discovery purposes. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
Dismissal of the small claims action thus achieves "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (CCA 1807; see Crosswell v Crosswell, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 873 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2008 NY Slip Op 52051[U] [2008]). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:07 pm by Michael Froomkin
Tony Newell, Coral Gables Commission Group V candidate, wants me to to tell you that despite some suggestions in this space in the past, he’s not a libertarian. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  In other words, the 1987 amendment was intended to reduce liabilitySo how could all this impair the learned intermediary rule, which also reduces liability? [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 11:55 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In other words, the IRS wants you to use the form 1040X just to correct your errors, nothing more. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Ron Coleman
 Here’s my take on today’s Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Intent may be inferred from words spoken, acts done, and other objective facts, and all the relevant circumstances at the time of the alleged abandonment should be considered. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:52 am by Woodrow Pollack
 Genericness is based on the use of a word in its relevant context, not the word itself. [read post]