Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 121 - 140 of 139,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
It does suggest a way of approaching interpretation and meaning making wit respect to which there may be less familiarity among stakeholders than might be assumed. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm by INFORRM
The brief comments on two issues: 1) Does the Court have jurisdiction over Venezuela in light of the 2019 decision by the interim government to annul the [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 3:50 am by SHG
This does’t quite capture the essence of the problem. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 11:02 am by Thomas James
Why It Matters A lot rides on whether a mark is suggestive or merely descriptive. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Benson Varghese
Gather Evidence: We will collect any evidence or witnesses that can support your case and demonstrate that your behavior does not violate the morals clause. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Benson Varghese
Gather Evidence: We will collect any evidence or witnesses that can support your case and demonstrate that your behavior does not violate the morals clause. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Benson Varghese
Gather Evidence: We will collect any evidence or witnesses that can support your case and demonstrate that your behavior does not violate the morals clause. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
To answer that question, it is necessary to go back and understand how the statutory presumption actually came about, to think about what it does and does not do, and to analyse what is really going on when courts are making decisions about contact against a backdrop of proven domestic abuse. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:03 pm by Sydney Ross Singer
  Making matters worse, the waist changes when sitting versus standing. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:50 pm
Moreover, the fight here is not centrally about whether COVID vaccines are effective or not, a matter about which there's (arguably) some factual dispute. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Swedish officials omitted any mention of these matters in Thursday’s announcement. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Swedish officials omitted any mention of these matters in Thursday’s announcement. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am by Kevin
The court says it is, citing Wikipedia, which does say that but doesn’t cite a source of its own. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
The proposed UN Cybercrime Convention, scheduled for a critical concluding session from 29 July to August 9th, poses a significant threat to global human rights unless major changes are made. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Eric Goldman
The case involves a matter of public concern, so the parties agreed that the plaintiff had to show actual malice. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:08 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
We know the system inside and out and will fight for your rights no matter the playing field. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 8:38 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  "Very hard" does not mean impossible, after all, and you appear to believe that it is bad to "weaponize" the courts. [read post]