Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z" Results 121 - 140 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A state court can say, "We find that procedure X violates provision Y of the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
’The format is tremendously flexible though, and claims like this are possible:‘Use of drug X in the manufacture of a medicament for preventing disease Y in an individual with gene Z that leads to susceptibility to disease Y, wherein drug X is administered by a device implanted in the arm of the individual which simultaneously delivers an electric current to the surrounding tissues. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For other posts in the series: Taxes From A To Z (2015): A Is For Actual Expense Method Taxes From A To Z (2015): B Is For Bona Fide Residence Test Taxes From A To Z (2015): C Is For Commuting Expenses Taxes From A To Z (2015): D Is For Disability Income Taxes From A To Z (2015): E Is For Early Distributions Taxes From A To Z (2015): F Is For FIFO Taxes From A To Z (2015): G Is For Gross Income Test Taxes From A To Z (2015): H… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:52 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Next up: Y Is For Years Certain Annuity An annuity is an insurance product that pays you each month for a specified term. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
  Ditto, Buckman – indeed, the explicit text of §337(a)’s prohibition of prvate enforcement is a fortiori from Armstrong, under the same reasoning.The Court’s second reason is why medical device plaintiffs shouldn’t be allowed to enforce vague FDA Current Good Manufacturing Practices that do nothing more than state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z:  Such vague standards are “judicially… [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm by Sean Hanover
(B) Driving while intoxicated, driving under the influence, and operating while impaired (§ 50‑2201.05); (C) A misdemeanor offense for which sex offender registration is required pursuant to Chapter 40 of Title 22, whether or not the registration period has expired; (D) Criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult (§ 22‑936(a)); (E) Interfering with access to a medical facility (§ 22‑1314.02); (F) Possession of a pistol by a convicted felon (§ 22‑4503(a)(2) [see… [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:03 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
So, you are dealing with a government that takes the view you plead to this – X Y Z – or no deal. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
It is entirely reasonable for the NYPD's analytics oriented senior commanders to conclude that, given both the City's existing crime rates and the department's "broken windows" theory of policing, optimally every month a minimum of X summonses ought to be issued, a Y number of Stop and Frisks ought to be carried out, and a Z number of arrests made. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
It is entirely reasonable for the NYPD's analytics oriented senior commanders to conclude that, given both the City's existing crime rates and the department's "broken windows" theory of policing, optimally every month a minimum of X summonses ought to be issued, a Y number of Stop and Frisks ought to be carried out, and a Z number of arrests made. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:03 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Estatua de la Madre Patria, 1967, 91 m (excl. el zócalo) 4. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm by Michael Geist
X is for the redacted information that frequently accompanies access to information request records. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm by Michael Geist
X is for the redacted information that frequently accompanies access to information request records. [read post]
The owner’s delegation to the operator to do X, Y, and Z for the owner is the kind of relationship that establishes an agency. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
., letting all the plaintiffs injured in X way or deceived in Y fashion go to trial together, an putting the W and/or Z plaintiffs on a different track? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
 The claim is unlikely to define a single mixture, but, either because x y and z are defined with ranges, or because other conditions v and w also affect the outcome but are not specified, a number of mixtures are possible that fall within the scope of the claims.The Anon went on to say“Said mixture not being characterisable by techniques in common practice today, but identifiable by a 3rd party using their new fangled gadget, such that they are able to… [read post]