Search for: "ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US " Results 121 - 140 of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch I just talked about the new Moderna v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
To be clear, I’d say that about any government official who advanced their job using their social media account yet blocked people from that account. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am by MBettman
Robust gatekeeping is important to ensure the reliability of new, advanced technologies that will likely be used in the future. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by Peg Duncan
It is the one that is most readily adapted to technological developments and it will not require courts to hear detailed forensic evidence of technological advances on an ongoing basis just to keep up with the times. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:41 am by Paul Rosenzweig
 The Court just spent 17 pages advancing any number of reasons why CSLI collection might be problematic. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:02 pm
  He discussed a case of particular interest to those of us here in Kentucky, Nickolas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
While the advances in the technology are exciting news for the film industry, the potential for misuse is significant. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am by INFORRM
The police’s use of technology in the prevention and detection of crime is well documented as being in compliance with the first two criterion. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:43 am by Docket Navigator
[W]hile the . . . patent claims feature other, specific limitations and requirements, such as the use of RFID receivers and the need for a 'remote computer system' or PDA to identify vehicles and communicate their scofflaw status to a centralized host system, none are directed to a technological improvement in how each component works, or in how the use of each component promotes a technological advance. . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:49 am by Woodrow Pollack
"While sympathetic to the ongoing crisis, the Court also needed to weigh its obligation to advance cases on its docket, so it granted the motion in part, encouraging the parties to use remote technology to advance the case:While the Court understands the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court is not convinced that a three-month continuance is warranted. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:49 am by Woodrow Pollack
"While sympathetic to the ongoing crisis, the Court also needed to weigh its obligation to advance cases on its docket, so it granted the motion in part, encouraging the parties to use remote technology to advance the case:While the Court understands the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court is not convinced that a three-month continuance is warranted. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:50 am by Heather Douglas
It is a technology that many counsel struggle with using. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
To read, ”Impact of Advances in DNA Sequencing Technology on Genetic Diagnostic Testing” in full, please click here. [read post]