Search for: "ALFORD v. US "
Results 121 - 140
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
Mann v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:54 am
But it appears that the Obama Justice Department is using the same playbook as Project Vote – to the detriment of clean elections. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
") AC32084 - State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The plea is named for the defendant in Alford v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
Alford, 400 U.S. 24 (1970). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:31 pm
Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), which allows a defendant “to enter a plea but . . . not . . . acknowledge guilt,” can be used to establish the nature of an offense for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) and Shepard v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
In Alford v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
In other words, since at least United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
In Pure Power Boot Camp v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
by Roger Alford The D.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:10 am
The facts in Alford v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:49 am
The term Alford plea comes from the 1970 US Supreme Court Case North Carolina v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Medlin v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:45 am
But occasionally its other things.Consider the Alford plea.The name comes from North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:16 pm
Greene, which was consolidated with Alford v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am
Plaut v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:18 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 to dismiss Camreta v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:05 am
Ross v Saravanos ;2011 NY Slip Op 31310(U) ; May 8, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 108017/2010; Judge: Emily Jane Goodman tells us that the shooter was sued in plenty of time, but the hotel was not, and that a case against the attorneys may continue on in legal malpractice. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Those cases are Alford v. [read post]
