Search for: "Abraham v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Part V reexamines case law that Blackman and Tillman rely on. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
The “agreement” at the core of an account stated is independent of the underlying obligation between the parties (see Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; Citibank [S.D.] [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:22 pm
Lincoln’s work in the now famous Illinois v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:56 am
Abraham Lincoln once noted that if he had six hours to chop down a tree, he would spend the first four sharpening the axe. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
Abraham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Akhil Amar and Doug Kendall discuss – among other things – President Abraham Lincoln’s “life in Illinois and the constitutional vision he developed as a lawyer in the Territories” and “Justice Anthony Kennedy’s upbringing in Californiaand its influence on what he may be thinking in the pending” challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm
Marbury got invoked today by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
“An account stated is an agreement between parties, based upon their prior transactions, with respect to the correctness of the account items and the specific balance due” (Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d 1053, 1056; see Michael B. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THEPREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE(UKRAINE v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
As his recent Legal 500 entry states, Tom is as "smooth as silk, and no doubt he will be one soon. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
” State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
" After a hearing, the State Board revoked the doctor's license.While the doctor raised an array of technical objections by way of an Article 78 proceeding, the Appellate Division, Third Department, ultimately concluded that the penalty did not "shock one's sense of fairness" and left the revocation undisturbed.Frankly, it would have been shocking if the AD3 had concluded otherwise.For a copy of Appellate… [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:32 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 5:00 am
Clarissa Zafirov v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:16 am
Schrock v. [read post]
