Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2009, 4:47 am
It was an encouraging sign that the court sees no blanket constitutional barrier to common-sense regulation of firearms. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 7:52 am
The 1998 Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which provides a number of rules and regulations with respect to children's online privacy, recently got an overhaul. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:45 pm
Kagan and Justice Neil Gorsuch fretted aloud about the prospect that a ruling for Total Wine and the Ketchums would open the doors to new challenges – for example, to other state laws regulating the sale and distribution of liquor. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
" * A lawyer must provide complete disclosure to a prospective client referred by a service about the lawyer’s participation in referral services. * The Bar should step up enforcement of its rules on lawyers participating in referral services. * The Bar should increase public education about rules and regulations on lawyers participating in referral services. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:56 am
This could, in some situations, implicate First Amendment issues. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:23 am
Effective July 1, 2007, the Ninth Circuit has promulgated amendments to its rules in several areas, as linked here. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, the American Bar Foundation and the Texas Bar Foundation, Ms. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:19 am
” And if the 10th Amendment bars the federal government from requiring states to regulate, they contend, it must also be true that the federal government cannot require states to keep on their books laws that they have opted to repeal – which amounts to essentially the same thing as mandatory regulation. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:28 am
And many of them did not think that such exams could be held without a legislative amendment (in the light of the Supreme Court ruling in V Sudeer, an aspect I will dwell upon later in this letter). [read post]
26 May 2022, 5:56 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Monday unanimously ruled in favor of a preliminary injunction against a Florida law regulating how social media companies moderate content on their platforms. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
[The Univ. of Pennsylvania legal scholar makes the most thorough critique yet of this approach to justifying regulations that bar social media firms from engaging in most types of content moderation.] [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:59 pm
Heller - whether the District's firearms regulations - which bar the possession of handguns and require shotguns and rifles to be kept disassembled or under trigger lock - violate the Second Amendment. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:50 am
Many Florida attorneys think that these latest rules proposed by the Florida Bar are a violation of their First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 6:42 am
The United States Department of Labor issued regulations earlier this year finalizing the “Persuader Rule. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 2:46 am
When the Florida Supreme Court issued this amendment to the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, allowing medical malpractice plaintiffs to waive their new constitutional right to keep certain percentages of their recoveries, the court offered a brief discussion on waiving rights before announcing it would not, at that time, determine the validity of the waiver mechanism the court approved: Numerous instances of judicial recognition of the right to waive… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:04 pm
” The order includes a writ barring state and local prosecutors from enforcing the prohibition on the intrastate sale of work pork until the regulations are enacted and the 180-day delay concludes. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Barring the death penalty for any crime that does not take the life of an individual victim, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that it is unconstitutional to impose the death penalty for the crime of raping a child. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In many cases, state courts have ruled that if the land use regulation was in effect at the time the landowner took possession of the property, then any expectations inconsistent with that regulation are unreasonable. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In many cases, state courts have ruled that if the land use regulation was in effect at the time the landowner took possession of the property, then any expectations inconsistent with that regulation are unreasonable. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:00 pm
Both rule amendments will become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
