Search for: "Amendments to Rules of Juvenile Procedure" Results 121 - 140 of 475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Ace Foam, Inc. 14-577Issue: (1) Whether the standing requirements of Article III apply to all members of a class certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23; and (2) whether certifying a class under Rule 23(b)(3) is improper where individualized damages issues predominate, and where plaintiffs rely exclusively on aggregate damages models that calculate damages purportedly incurred by the class as a whole, rather than by individual class members. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:04 am by Scott Grabel
In June of 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that in the case of juveniles convicted of homicide, the death penalty or a sentence of life without parole were unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Dietrich revealed what she knew even before the trial — the names of her attackers — and that they are juveniles cannot strip her of her First Amendment rights on this score. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:57 am by Andrew Delaney
For example, the Family Division has exclusive jurisdiction over juvenile proceedings. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Alabama adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively on collateral review to juveniles sentenced to life without parole; and (2) whether Miller requires individualized sentencing for marginally older teenage offenders who were severely mentally disabled at the time of their crimes. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am by Jeff Welty
Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure did not restrict the discretion of the Court of Appeals to consider defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
BushJuly 25, 2006: House agreed to Senate amendments by voice voteJuly 20, 2006: Passed Senate as amended by voice voteMarch 8, 2006: Passed House by voice voteOther StatusMay 17, 2007: Proposed guidelines issued by the Office of Justice Programs.February 28, 2007: Interim rule with request for comments (by April 30, 2007) issued. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:20 am
”  __________   Model Penal Code: Sexual Assault and Related Offenses Motion to Amend Section 213.3(2)(b)(iv), Sexual Assault of a Vulnerable Person: Motion by:  Ron Henry   This section is over-broad and creates improper per secrimes. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Lane retroactivity formula, but also having ruled in a prior case that Miller did not apply retroactively because it was a procedural ruling, and did not involve the basic fairness of trial procedures. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am by Michael O'Hear
”  Have there been any areas of criminal law or procedure in which the Court has been more closely divided in recent decades than those of the Fourth Amendment and Miranda? [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:30 am by Russ Bensing
  One of the other reasons I don’t like handling these cases is that the rules of procedure and evidence seem to be honored mainly in the breach, and so it is here. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Bronx Family Lawyer said section 164 of the Family Court Act states that the provisions of the Civil Practice Act shall apply to proceedings under this act and therefore, aside from all other reasons, it must be presumed that this court is basically a civil court and not a criminal court and that the rules of civil procedure rather than the more stringent rules of criminal procedure should prevail. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
Montana, the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a speedy trial does not apply to sentencing. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:31 am
To retrieve the text of any of the New York  bills listed below, go to [public.leginfo.state.ny.us]  and enter bill number exactly as indicated: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW: Bill No. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am by Josh Blackman
She concluded that the Eighth Amendment bars a sentence of mandatory life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile homicide offenders. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Thankfully such gaps are rare, and today’s result is the exception that proves the rule. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
As noted here, SG Kagan failed to argue against a bright-line rule against LWOP for all juveniles in nonhomicide cases, even though federal judgments were at stake. [read post]