Search for: "Andrews v. Hand"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
Any recalibration of the standard of proof remains in its hands. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
Andrews (acted nervously) with United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
In ITV v TV CatchUp [2011] EWHC 2977 (Pat), which was handed down the day of the debate and which the IPKat reported here, Floyd J applied FAPL in the UK to say that the position on the temporary copies exception is acte clair as set out in FAPL, which would seem to contradict NLA v Meltwater. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:23 am
In Boyd & Anor v Ineos Upstream Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 515, the Court of Appeal handed down a fascinating judgment exploring the tension between the exercise of the rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression and the protection of property rights. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Andrews (acted nervously) with United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm
“Someone could have put their hand in the window and unlocked the door and taken the kids” [Lenore Skenazy/Free Range Kids; related stories here and here; similar, Illinois Policy] Police warn that plan in Scotland to provide state guardian for every child could backfire in abuse investigations [Telegraph, more on “named person” scheme] Also from Scotland: Law Society says proposed ban on liquor promotion is so broad it might snag parent wearing rugby-sponsor… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Andrew McNamara was ordered to pay £90K to Tods Murray after bitter 16 year court battle. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.JON BARTLETT, ANDREW R. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:32 am
In a judgment handed down at the High Court today in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Mitting rejected a Human Rights Act challenge to recoverable success fees and ATE insurance premiums brought by the Daily Mail. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
Once the issue is seen to involve both Article 10 and Article 8, the applicant’s pleadings based on Armoniene v Lithuania (2009) 48 EHRR 53 and I v Finland (2009) 48 EHRR 31 become a misapplication of those cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Supreme Court ruled, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:27 pm
The four worked intimately together from before Pearl Harbor until after V-E day, and you have to give them this: they one the war. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
” In Illinois v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 11:40 am
Andrews, to lows of 8 each in DeHart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the Reproductive Health Act into law on January 22, 2019, the forty-sixth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s historic ruling in Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
(See Gibson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
Andrew Miller probably shouldn’t hold his breath. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Judgment has been reserved and we will report on it when it is handed down. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 2:14 am
In the decision in Santander UK Plc v R.A. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:12 pm
Although Andrews v. [read post]
