Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 121 - 140 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, this ignores the fact that ascertaining liability in asbestos lawsuits is no easy feat, given the latency of the disease and the fact that exposure occurred many decades earlier and that asbestos was used for so many products and materials. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The asbestos-containing product manufacturers settled or were bankrupt. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Johns-Manville Products Corp.: Evolution or Revolution in Strict Products Liability? [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:26 am by William A. Ruskin
Once summary judgment is denied, many asbestos defendants with questionable liability will often settle out rather than risk the financial exposure of an adverse result in a mesothelioma jury trial. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by Bexis
June 7, 2005) – all holding that the heeding presumption is limited to strict liability and that Pennsylvania bars use of strict liability in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Baker, from the just-ended Supreme Court term [Federalist Society podcast with Ted Frank, earlier] Why Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Supreme Court case on state court jurisdiction, “is one of the most important mass tort/product liability decisions ever” [James Beck/Drug & Device Law, earlier] Sandy Hook massacre: “Newtown And Board Of Education Seek Dismissal Of Wrongful Death Lawsuit” [AP/CBS Connecticut] Pennsylvania: “Evidence-Manipulation… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, this ignores the fact that ascertaining liability in asbestos lawsuits is no easy feat, given the latency of the disease and the fact that exposure occurred many decades earlier and that asbestos was used for so many products and materials. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm by Eric Schindler
To reiterate: The release of asbestos from a product into the air people breathe constitutes a health hazard for which no level of exposure is safe. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Carnival Corp. 16-1074 Issue: Whether, when a Jones Act seafarer alleges negligence based on asbestos exposure, the applicable causation test is the ‘featherweight’ causation standard, or the ‘substantial factor’ causation test as applied in products liability cases. [read post]