Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 121 - 140
of 551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
A holding to the contrary would permit imposition of liability on the manufacturer of any product with which a worker had the briefest of encounters on a single occasion. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:01 am
Crane Co., et al., plaintiffs, husband and wife, challenge several industrial manufacturers, alleging liability for the husband’s mesothelioma allegedly linked to defendant’s asbestos-laden products. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 7:15 am
In Stockton v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
Baker, from the just-ended Supreme Court term [Federalist Society podcast with Ted Frank, earlier] Why Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Supreme Court case on state court jurisdiction, “is one of the most important mass tort/product liability decisions ever” [James Beck/Drug & Device Law, earlier] Sandy Hook massacre: “Newtown And Board Of Education Seek Dismissal Of Wrongful Death Lawsuit” [AP/CBS Connecticut] Pennsylvania: “Evidence-Manipulation… [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:01 am
In cases such as Rohl, where the primary issue is one of product liability, Illinois courts have found that the location of the accident is less significant and largely supplanted by a more general interest in resolving a claim concerning an allegedly defective product.[5] Also, because a jury visit to the accident site is generally unnecessary, the significance of this factor is further diminished in product liability claims.[6] On appeal, forum… [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Carl v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
Finding that the claims against Owens-Illinois were frivolous, the Seventh Circuit agreed with the district court that “there is unanimity among courts that product liability cannot attach to the mere licensing of a patent. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
In 2013, the plaintiff brought a lawsuit against the employer for products liability and negligence on the ground that she developed mesothelioma due to her exposure to asbestos brought home on her husband’s clothing. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 12:18 pm
The plaintiffs brought negligence and strict liability claims against the business that installed the asbestos-containing products, based on a failure to warn. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The application of product and premises liability tests is undoubtedly a complex and difficult endeavor for state courts, as there are numerous factors that come into play when a secondary asbestos exposure case is examined. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The application of product and premises liability tests is undoubtedly a complex and difficult endeavor for state courts, as there are numerous factors which come into play when a secondary asbestos exposure case is examined. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
The application of product and premises liability tests is undoubtedly a complex and difficult endeavor for state courts, as there are numerous factors that come into play when a secondary asbestos exposure case is examined. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:26 am
[The case is General Refractories Co. v First State Insurance Co.] [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:21 pm
As our Boston mesothelioma attorneys can explain, these are primarily product liability cases, filed against the designers, manufacturers and distributors of asbestos-laden products. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:39 am
Refractories Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Carnival Corp. 16-1074 Issue: Whether, when a Jones Act seafarer alleges negligence based on asbestos exposure, the applicable causation test is the ‘featherweight’ causation standard, or the ‘substantial factor’ causation test as applied in products liability cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am
For asbestos, that would be in the mid-1980s when asbestos exclusions started to appear.) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:14 am
For asbestos, that would be in the mid-1980s when asbestos exclusions started to appear.) [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Quester v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
It can be raised by government contractor defendants in certain product liability lawsuits, such as those pertaining to asbestos exposure. [read post]
