Search for: "B Ware" Results 121 - 140 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Section 7(b) of the Trade-marks Act, states thatNo person shall direct public attention to his wares, services or business in such a way as to cause or be likely to cause confusion in Canada, at the time he commenced so to direct attention to them, between his wares, services or business and the wares, services or business of another. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
” But here’s the real punch line: Drug users and software users are about equally likely to recover damages for whatever harms those wares cause them. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
surely we can find some crackpot in a basement who'll whip some up), well, then there's plan B. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court drew a similar con- clusion regarding indirect infringement, as to which it found, as well, insufficient proof of the required intent.Given the absence of evidence that any steps were per- formed by IBM or that an entire claimed hard- ware/software system was ever made, used, sold, offered to sell, or imported by IBM or its customers, the district court was compelled to find no direct or indirect infringe- ment. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce Boyden
Given that it was a motion to dismiss, the district court’s task was only to determine if the plaintiffs stated a valid complaint, and Judge Ware seems to have done that. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Given that it was a motion to dismiss, the district court’s task was only to determine if the plaintiffs stated a valid complaint, and Judge Ware seems to have done that. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
(b) Appropriate the property to his or her own use or to the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property.11 Copyright opponents such as Falkvinge appear to have a greatly attenuated understanding of what property is and what it means to deprive someone of that property. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm by Larry Munn
Was deceptively misdescriptive of the character or quality of the wares, based on section 12(1)(b) of the Act; and 3. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm by Bruce Boyden
Essentially what (B) is getting at, according to the legislative history, is spread-spectrum techniques, which are now used in cell phones and cordless phones. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Essentially what (B) is getting at, according to the legislative history, is spread-spectrum techniques, which are now used in cell phones and cordless phones. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm by Gregory Forman
I’ve avoided blogging about the June 12, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Ware v. [read post]