Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
U.S. in 1911 and joined the opinion upholding the Mann Act banning “white slavery” or prostitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oklahoma, Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
(U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
In W.B. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
After Professor Sikorski's presentation, I filled in for Kent Baker of u-blox, who wasn't able to travel that week, to give a quick overview of the Continental v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:40 pm
What is perhaps the key case on-point well known but quite old: Baker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
On the Friday before the election, U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:45 am
Baker in the Southern District and assigned Case 1:18-cv-03633-JRS-TAB. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
We went back to the historical review of presidential impeachments written by Jon Meacham, Timothy Naftali, Peter Baker and Jeffrey Engel. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Australia On 18 October 2019 the Supreme Court of Queensland Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Harbour Radio v Wagner [2019] QCA 221. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
While the courts are still to decide on the fate of OPPS, its implementation in the short run may slow down the rate of physician practice acquisitions by hospitals. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
While the courts are still to decide on the fate of OPPS, its implementation in the short run may slow down the rate of physician practice acquisitions by hospitals. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
” At the Supreme Court, the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
