Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman for 25 years. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:38 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Paxton (vacating stay), United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Perhaps the most eye-opening was Dubin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Fifth, Justice Alito said nothing at all about the judicial philosophies of Justices Barrett or Kavanaugh. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Perhaps by rushing the United States Capitol to seize control and prevent it from complying with the Constitution and rulings of the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm
Sobkowski (United States District Courts) has posted Of Major Questions and Nondelegation (Yale Journal on Regulation, 2023) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
