Search for: "Barron v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Still, a special thank you to @IAmOxfordComma on Twitter, which reduced the First Circuit’s decision in O’Connor v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Still, a special thank you to @IAmOxfordComma on Twitter, which reduced the First Circuit’s decision in O’Connor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On Tuesday 31 January 2017, Warby J heard the compensation application in the long running case of Barron v Collins. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 December 2016, Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Barron v Collins [2016] EWHC 3350 (QB) explaining his reasons for refusing UKIP MEP Jane Collins permission vacate her offer of amends. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Barron v Vines [2016] EWHC 1226 (QB) (Warby J) – damages were assessed in the sum of £40,000 for each claimant. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
Trump announces that he will not run** or will no longer run for the Presidency of the United States of America in the current U.S. presidential election cycle“] you promise and agree not to assist or counsel, directly or indirectly, for compensation or as a volunteer, any person that is a candidate or exploring candidacy for President of the United States other than Mr. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore held that the Plaintiffs stated a ripe claim of intentional discrimination under the FHAA and ADA. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:03 am by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore held that the Plaintiffs stated a ripe claim of intentional discrimination under the FHAA and ADA. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 2 June 2016, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Barron v Vines ([2016] EWHC 1226 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
He replied to the claimants’ letter before action in January 2015 stating that he wanted to “take the opportunity to clear up any misunderstanding“. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by INFORRM
 Damages are effectively capped at £275,000 for the most serious possible libel (see Barron v Vines [2016] EWHC 1226 (QB)) but, in practice, even after a contested trial awards rarely exceed £100,000. [read post]