Search for: "Bernstein v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2020, 5:57 am
Varallo, Andrew Blumberg, and Alla Zayenchik, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, on Tuesday, June 2, 2020 Editor's Note: Gregory V. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Without some form of knowledge (be it actual or constructive), a lawsuit alleging a tort theory will not survive a motion to dismiss.In Bernstein v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:50 pm
” I conclude that this jurisprudence was primarily a reflection of a natural rights tradition that suggested that the states’ police power had inherent limits.Chapter 2: Paul Kens’s book on Lochner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
Bernstein Fellowship in International Human Rights.) [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
"Defendant client's occasional oral objections to plaintiff law firm's bills were insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated (see Duane Morris LLP v Astor Holdings Inc., 61 AD3d 418, 419 [2009]). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Cabraser, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP Tracy R. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:14 am
An example of where the Court could have exhibited more deference than it did was United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
(David Bernstein) Andy Koppelman has another essay, this time in the New Republic, analogizing the litigation over the ACA to the Child Labor Cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:45 am
But recall that Justice Blackmun in Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
In Bernstein v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 3:40 am
Supp. 2d 174, 180 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (quoting Bernstein v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm
Imagine, for example, if the ghost of Justice William Day, author of Hammer v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:36 am
(David Bernstein) I want to analyze two positions that I’ve seen liberals take on the role of government in promoting civil rights and antidiscrimination norms. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
(David Bernstein) I was going to write a post suggesting that Roberts’s vote may have come out the other way if Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
Coverage also centers around the results of the Court’s decision this past Term in United States v. [read post]
