Search for: "Board of Education v. State Board of Education"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 11:32 am
State Board of Education 874 F.2d 1036, 441 IDELR 433 (5th Cir. 1989). [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:33 am
Wilson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
A board may not appoint one of its own members to a vacant position under it jurisdiction Fishman v Board of Educ. of S. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
State Board of Education 874 F.2d 1036, 441 IDELR 433 (5th Cir. 1989). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 am
The court concluded that the Board's "decision is rationally related to the State's legitimate interest in protecting the public by preserving the integrity of educational degrees. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:22 am
Probationary termination procedure found consistent with due processPersico v NYC Board of Education, Appellate Division, 250 A.D.2d 854Isabella G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
Concerning filing a timely Article 78Budihas v Board of Education, 285 AD2d 549Bonilla v Board of Education, 285 AD2d 548 When does the four-month Statute of Limitation to file a timely Article 78 petition begin to run? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of New Riegel Local School District Board of Education et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm
" [Bell Canada v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
--Petitioner, a former board member[1], appeals certain actions taken by the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Albany (“respondent” or “board”). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
"The test of whether a decision is arbitrary or capricious is "determined largely by whether a particular action should have been taken or is justified . . . and whether the administrative action is without foundation in fact.'" (See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222].Other points made by Justice Feinman:1. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 12:26 pm
City and County of San Francisco, the defendants, the City and County of San Francisco, argued that despite the California Constitution stating that all voters must be United States citizens, under Article IX, section 16(a) of the California Constitution, charter cities like San Francisco are allowed to provide for the time, manner, and terms for which members of the boards of education are elected. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"** Section 35.g of the Civil Service Law provides, in pertinent, part, " (g) all persons employed by any title whatsoever as members of the teaching and supervisory staff of a school district, board of cooperative educational services or county vocational education and extension board, as certified to the state commission by the commissioner of education. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Less than 30-days notice of termination of a probationary educator does not always result in the payment back salary Vetter v Board of Educ., Ravena- Coeymans-Selkirk Cent. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:59 am
Quattrone v NYS Department of Education, 37 A.D.3d 939 Elizabeth G. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
An educator's claim of tenure by estoppel may be defeated if the educator agrees to an extension of his or her probationary periodSlutsky-Nava v Yonkers City School Dist. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:10 am
An Article 78 challenge to a school board's tenure determination must be initiated within four months of the determination becoming “final and binding” upon the aggrieved partyGarofano v Board of Educ. of Ramapo Cent. [read post]
