Search for: "Brown v. South Carolina, State of" Results 121 - 140 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Brown & Root, Inc., 207 F.3d 717 (4th Cir. 2000); Brown & Kerr Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
South Carolina (2002) -- capital defendant's due process right to inform jury of his parole ineligibility FEC v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
[Author’s note: The Leon good-faith exception does not apply to violations of the North Carolina Constitution under State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court of South Carolina discussed this fact pattern in State v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Department of Justice The Pointless Redaction Award: Mueller Report The Repeat Winner Award: Atlanta Mayor’s Office The Unnecessary Fee Award: Horry County, South Carolina The Surveillance for You, Privacy for Us Award: Ring Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Department of Justice The Pointless Redaction Award: Mueller Report The Repeat Winner Award: Atlanta Mayor’s Office The Unnecessary Fee Award: Horry County, South Carolina The Surveillance for You, Privacy for Us Award: Ring Inc. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am by Gerard Magliocca
 In a few Southern States (most notably North Carolina) this interracial alliance managed to wrest control of the state legislature and elect members of Congress. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
 Those habeas claims, which challenged the legality of Padilla’s military detention at the Naval Consolidated Brig in South Carolina were, however, eventually made moot (after being re-filed in the District of South Carolina) when authorities transferred Padilla to civilian custody while he stood trial on criminal charges. [read post]