Search for: "Browne & Appel, LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
CASH BIZ, LP,CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC PANEL MAJORITY OPINION BY THE COURT OF APPEALS BELOWWITH DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE MARTINEZ  CASH BIZ, LP, Redwood Financial, LLC, Cash Zone, LLC dba Cash Biz, Appellants,v.Hiawatha HENRY, Addie Harris, Montray Norris, and Roosevelt Coleman Jr., et al., Appellees.No. 04-15-00469-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.Delivered and Filed: July 27,… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION  STEPHEN A. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:36 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
The vast majority of drug dealers I deal with—white, black or brown—are terminally stupid. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by June Casey
Professor Lahav received her B.A. in history from Brown University and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Vilar, the Second Circuit was the first appellate court to address the issue. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
By David Boundy David Boundy of Cambridge Technology Law LLC, a patent law firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts, practices at the intersection of patent and administrative law, and consults with other firms on PTAB trials and appeals. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  The 4th appellate district court affirmed, holding that the ordinance was not a project under CEQA. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
’” Brief for Appellants at 36 (quoting 133 S. [read post]