Search for: "Buckman " Results 121 - 140 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2011, 6:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The story had text:"I assume that something must be happening on the intellectual-property front -- I can't explain it any other way," said Ulysses Yannas, a broker with Buckman, Buckman & Reid in New York. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
The Buckman Court gave two primary reasons for this holding. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm by Michelle Yeary
  At that time, the court found plaintiff’s claims preempted by Buckman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
  Putting aside our view on parallel claims generally, certainly a claim that the manufacturer did something wrong by failing to report adverse events to the FDA is nothing more than a private party trying to enforce federal drug and medical device regulations, which the FDCA prohibits and which is preempted under Buckman. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
  The generics of course answered "no" because that would not just be a penumbra from Buckman, that is Buckman. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 3:34 am
Supreme Court Activity in Medical Device and Drug Preemption Cases Express Preemption in the Lower Courts Preemption and Buckman Implied Preemption in the Lower Courts Recent Legislation Miscellaneous Cases Click here to read more. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm by John J. Sullivan
This conclusion is confirmed by the Court’s analysis in Buckman. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
This difference, however, is immaterial in light of Buckman. . . . [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm
The Arkansas family was travelling southbound on I-295 and as they crossed over the Buckman Bridge, their Chevrolet Tahoe stalled. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
In its absence, state law could impose legal duties that would conflict directly with federal regulatory mandates.Id. at 870-71 (citations and quotation marks omitted).These decisions were in turn applied to the FDCA by a unanimous court in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am by Bexis
  Thanks to Ken Geller at Mayer Brown for passing it along.The highlights:(1) Express preemption under Riegel and implied preemption under Buckman work in tandem where violation claims are alleged (an argument we've been advancing here forever):"Riegel and Buckman create a narrow gap through which a plaintiff’s state-law claim must fit if it is to escape express or implied preemption. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 11:03 am
Kent argument found several justices troubled about where to draw the Buckman preemption lineâ€â [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Buckman, as most of you probably know (otherwise, why are you here?) [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Allegations amounting to fraud on the FDA are preempted by Buckman. [read post]