Search for: "Burns v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Escobar (5th Cir. 2020) (affirming dismissal of the political retaliation claims of a Crime Victim Unit Coordinator because she "represented the DA's office to crime victims" and to "other members of the law enforcement community"); Hagan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 In June of this year, the Supreme Court of the United States issued four landmark decisions, all decided by 6-3 partisan votes. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
  COVID-19 COVID-19 has infected over 98.088 million people and has now killed over 1.07 million people in the United States, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:06 am by Clara Apt
Climate Change and the Courts Greenhouse Gaslighting: Deceptive Moderation and West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
” Harvard Law School professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating that “China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]