Search for: "C-Squared Managment, LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
 Where the two Courts diverged, however, was at the point that the Court of Chancery determined that "... if a Cede breakdown is part of the stock ledger for purposes of  Section 220(b), it logically should be part of the stock ledger for purposes of Section 219(c).... [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), a non-FDCA case involving violation claims under a different statute. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  In Noble Asset Management v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
My email inbox has gotten out of control, and I had to declare partial email bankruptcy. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, and Part I of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]