Search for: "COTTER "
Results 121 - 140
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am
” Briefly: At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter observes that the court’s recent order reviving the administration’s “remain in Mexico” immigration policy demonstrates that “[t]he rule of law in the Trump administration and the court’s role in shaping our nation continue to be the focus — and we are not even at the end of this year’s Supreme Court term. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Cotter Corp., 328 F.3d 1212, 1221 (10th Cir. 2003), citing in turn Daubert v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
It also commented in the same piece on parallel proceedings taking place in the UK.In a similar vein, Tom Cotter of Comparative Patent Remedies published further comments on the USPTO, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology's 'Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments'.The Kluwer Patent Blog hosted commentary on a recent decision of… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
” In a column for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter “address[es] a rebuke by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks at some recent decisions and dissents in divisive cases. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” In an op-ed for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter reviews Ruth Marcus’ recent book, “Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed for The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter considers two “judicial enigmas” on the Supreme Court: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
By Daniel Cotter* When the Mueller Report was expected in the early months of 2019, the question of the potential for a sitting president to be indicted was debated. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter remarks on the court’s refusal last week to expedite consideration of “the Affordable Care Act challenge in Texas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:43 am
Cotter, Rethinking Patent Damages, 10 Tex. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
” Another look at Roberts’ role comes from Daniel Cotter at the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required). [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
But it is taken into consideration, and a licensing-based business model certainly doesn't weigh in favor of an injunction, which is why "patent trolls" rarely obtain injunctions in U.S. district court at this stage.While we're on the subject of comparative law, I appreciate Professor Thomas Cotter's latest Comparative Patent Remedies blog post, in which he "certainly agree[s] that 'the German statute falls far short of eBay v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am
Meanwhile, the ministry has published its draft bill.On his (strongly recommended) Comparative Patent Remedies blog, Professor Thomas Cotter indicated my reaction to the draft bill made more sense to him after reading the explanations provided by the ministry. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:49 am
The draft has already been discussed on various patent-specific blogs, for instance on Professor Thomas Cotter's Comparative Patent Remedies blog, so it will not be discussed in detail here. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter “takes a look back at the 1950s and 1960s, the period of the Warren Court, thanks to an excellent book that came out this month. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 pm
By Daniel Cotter* On December 18, 2019, President Donald J. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter reflects on “the most momentous, the biggest and the most noteworthy” Supreme Court cases of the past decade. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"This is consistent with Professor Contreras's warning--based on a write-up by Professor Cotter--against "circular logic" by comparing current prices (here, royalty rates) with former prices that already resulted from a monopoly position.In this context, the AAI and PK explain the difference between the two most common types of disclosure: raising rivals' costs ("RRC") and predatory pricing. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
" Here, Professor Contreras cites to a publication by Professor Thomas Cotter (University of Minnesota and author of the highly recommended Comparative Patent Remedies blog): Reasonable Royalties, in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus.In the third and final part, Professor Contreras takes aim at Qualcomm's "national security" argument. [read post]
