Search for: "California v. Davis" Results 121 - 140 of 1,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am by Eric Goldman
The post Texan J6er’s Social Media Censorship Case Moved to CaliforniaDavis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Josh Blackman
Davis held that a criminal penalty for using a firearm during a "crime of violence" was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
But even these two Justices were forced to address (and ultimately chose to embrace) Smiley, (its predecessor Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court’s precedents on affirmative action dated back to 1978, when a divided Court came to a mixed decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Boston University School of Law, and Mary Ziegler, University of California, Davis School of Law, have posted Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists, which is forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review:This article employs the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Tsai (Boston University - School of Law) & Mary Ziegler (University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists (UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 57, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Texas joins California, Colorado, Connecticut, Montana, Virginia, and Utah (all in effect or going into effect in 2023), Montana and Tennessee (which, like Texas, go into effect in 2024), Iowa (effective 2025) and Indiana (effective 2026). [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
He favorably quotes Justice Scalia's memorable statement from Bendix Autolite Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]