Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 60,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Finally, sequential unmasking can lead to a significant increase in costs as the legal team will need to have several calls or meetings with a candidate before asking the crucial questions to discover if the expert is supportive of their client’s position. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:36 am
In Pinn v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
Prosecutors, for example, cannot mention the names of the two women who would have indeed been potential Molineux witnesses if called: Leeds and Stoynoff. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
According to the Act, approximately $300 billion in Russian sovereign assets have been immobilized worldwide, with approximately $4 to $5 billion of those assets subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.2 Over the past year, there have been increasing calls to make those assets available to Ukraine to support its reconstruction and recovery efforts. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The key here is whether ‘the rules of private international law’ call for the application of a Contracting State’s law. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]