Search for: "Center for Regulatory Reasonableness v. EPA" Results 121 - 140 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2012, 10:34 pm by Leland E. Beck
  The Department of Agriculture withdrew the National Organic Program: Sunset Review for Nutrient Vitamins and Minerals final rule (admittedly economically significant), but no reason has been given. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm by WIMS
EPA's disapproval of Texas' permitting program has unraveled approximately 140 permits, created great regulatory uncertainty, and stalled the creation of thousands of new jobs. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am by Schachtman
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F.3d 171 (6th Cir. 2009), rev’g No. 3:04-CV-294, 2008 WL 2359986 (E.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
  Despite the Center’s best efforts, many federal judges have shown themselves to be incorrigible. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:38 am by Robert Oszakiewski
UPDATE: The parties in International Center for Technology Assessment et al v Hamburg, in a stipulation filed with the court on January 13, 2012, agreed  to grant the EPA " an extension of time to April 23, 2012 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint". [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm by WIMS
Access the complete posting from the Pew Center (click here). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am by Lovechilde
Charlie Cray is a research specialist with Greenpeace USA and the director of the Center for Corporate Policy in Washington, DC. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:29 am by Shari Shapiro
The reason I started this post by saying that these regulatory efforts may (not will) shift the green building and renewable energy industries is because of the massive efforts being undertaken to derail the regulatory efforts. [read post]