Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne" Results 121 - 140 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Like the law on passing off, it is a legal construction of UK courts which Danckwerts J first acknowledged in 1960 in Bollinger SA v Costa Brava Wine [this resulted from an action aimed at preventing the defendants from calling their product 'Spanish champagne'], and has more recently excited the minds and hearts (and possibly also the hunger) of passing off enthusiasts with, for instance, the Greek Yoghurt case [here, here and… [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
  For reasons discussed below, Cadbury may want to keep the champagne corked just for the moment. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Lewry (Brooks Kushman PC) on Commil v Cisco and current US thinking on the necessary mind-set for being a secondary patent infringer [Annsley the AmeriKat discussed the same case here]. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:43 am by Paul Horwitz
In his hopeful post on the oral argument yesterday in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
As noted by Judge Wardlaw in her concurring opinion, Costco sells “a wide range of luxury goods, including Dom Pérignon Champagne, Waterford crystal, Dolce & Gabbana handbags”(p. 9). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Wang v. [read post]