Search for: "City of Providence v. First National Stores, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
City of Highland Park, 15-133, stuck around for its third re-list. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor was the franchise trade group able to demonstrate that it would serve the public interest to enjoin enforcement of the minimum wage ordinance, the appeals court said, affirming a district court’s decision denying preliminary injunctive relief (International Franchise Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19]  Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> Judges Skeptical of Challenge to Proposed EPA Rule on Climate Change - (New York Times) A panel of federal judges appeared inclined on Thursday to dismiss the first legal challenge to President Obama's most far-reaching regulation to slow climate change (Murray Energy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and its progeny. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
City of Long Beach 14-151Issue: (1) Whether the Heck v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm by Jon Gelman
Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc., 47 N.J. 38, 219 A.2d 168 (1966). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
For the first time, the Framework provides industry with a risk-based approach for developing and improving cybersecurity programs. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In the wake of last month’s Supreme Court ruling in Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc — where the Court held that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage regulations violate the religious rights of closely held private corporations — some advocates feared that the new EO might contain a sweeping religious exemption. [read post]