Search for: "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
S. 310 (1945) Because Pennsylvania is one of five states that currently requires all out-of-state businesses registering to do business in the State to consent to be sued in the state as a condition of registration, however, Mallory argued and the Supreme Court agreed in Mallory that Norfolk waived its ability to object to personal jurisdiction when it registered to do business in the Commonwealth. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:43 pm
[Opinion not reported], The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court rejected a Plaintiff’s challenge to Pennsylvania’s liability caps for state agencies. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Colleges and universities in the Commonwealth should prioritize admission of students from schools that were found to be underfunded in violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
This is because Pennsylvania history, says the court, does not provide evidence that the Commonwealth’s prohibition differs from the federal one. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
This is because Pennsylvania history, says the court, does not provide evidence that the Commonwealth’s prohibition differs from the federal one. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Constitution.[3] A Pennsylvania statute, however, requires out-of-state companies that register to do business in Pennsylvania to consent to the Commonwealth’s exercise of general personal jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:27 am
Farmer was admitted to the bars of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:52 am
“Appellate Judges Reject Challenge to Pennsylvania State Damages Cap; The ruling upholds an order reducing a $7 million verdict against SEPTA to $250,000; The case, which is likely bound for the Supreme Court, is part of a broader effort to dismantle liability caps”: Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer has this report on an unpublished opinion that the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued yesterday. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:35 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of POM, allowing it to review Eckert’s privileged logs. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
.), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the entry of summary judgment in a slip and fall case. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
" To "dissolve the political bands" revokes the "social compact" that existed between the Americans and the rest of "the People" of the British commonwealth, reinstates the "state of nature" between Americans and the government of Great Britain, and makes "the Laws of Nature" the standard by which this dissolution and whatever government is to follow are judged. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:18 am
A complaint filed with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania by current and former Republican representatives in the state challenged the integrity of the law as a whole due to its nonseverability clause. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
People lie. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm
PENNSYLVANIA COURT RULES THAT EMPLOYERS MUST REIMBURSE OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE On March 17, 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, in the companion cases of Appel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Meanwhile, the number of licensed lawyers in the Commonwealth has grown immensely. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:39 pm
Allegedly, Pennsylvania law dictates that a foreign corporation has to register with the Department of State of the Commonwealth before conducting business in the state and that, in doing so, they consent to personal jurisdiction within the state. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:38 pm
Range access to a gun, even though his crime was but a misdemeanor here in Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
But, Pennsylvania law is clear (except when it isn’t)* that the law of contracts applies even to domestic relations agreements. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:56 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
While this seems contrary to the words, if not the spirit, of the Act, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania says this is perfectly fine. [read post]
