Search for: "Commonwealth v. Lowe" Results 121 - 140 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Come prepared for a lively, interactive workshop.World Café Hosts:Dayna Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCharity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawSidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of LawInvited Discussants and Participants:Rodney Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Health AdministrationChristina Juris Bennett, University of Oklahoma College of LawAmy Campbell, University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
The developments included cases from Canada, the U.S. the U.K., and other Commonwealth countries. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 9:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Lowe’s Faces Possible Punitive Damages at Brain Injury Slip and Fall Trial, April 1, 2016, By David Siegel, CVN More Blog Entries: Snaras v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
It is wise to remember the words of Mason J in Commonwealth of Australia v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] HCA 44: “It can scarcely be a relevant detriment to the government that publication of material concerning its actions will merely expose it to public discussion and criticism. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In regards to the appellant’s claim that the standard of proof of “reasonable grounds of suspicion” is too low, Carnwath explained that the position of a decision-maker trying to assess risk in advance is very different from that of a decision-maker trying to determine whether someone has actually done something wrong. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by David Russcol
The second change, in 2014, came in the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Charles G. Kels
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]