Search for: "Commonwealth v. Roberts, S." Results 121 - 140 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” Judge Chuang’s ruling early this morning in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 2:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
From last week’s Pennsylvania trial court decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
Commonwealth, supra.The court then explained that, [a]s part of his investigation, Det. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:57 am by Karen Hoffmann
She was a member of the Independent Committee appointed by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to review the Australian Citizenship Test in 2008 and she has appeared three times in the High Court of Australia on citizenship matters, with her work cited in Singh v Commonwealth (2004). [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:51 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 91205 (ED CA, July 13, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge, denying a preliminary injunction, rejected a Catholic inmate's claim that denial of conjugal visits infringed his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA.In Roberts v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
With respect to Frank’s right-sided (non-sinister) opinion, the Commonwealth Court framed the employer’s issue as a contention that Dr. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Roberts Another School Violated a Student’s First Amendment Rights by Disciplining Her For Facebook Posts — R.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the Roberts Court’s death penalty cases more broadly, concluding that “one more vote could very well lead to a return of the moratorium on the death penalty that this country saw in the mid-1970’s between the Court’s rulings in Furman v. [read post]