Search for: "Costello v. Costello" Results 121 - 140 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, the defendant's efforts to paint his actions in a favorable light are unavailing, as his recent averments directly contradict both his 2008 affirmation and the averments of Thomas Fatato, Striano's brother, who submitted an affidavit on the defendant's behalf (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Telfeyan v City of New York, 40 AD3d 372, 373). [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 10:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
”Other court rulings sustaining the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s denial of unemployment insurance benefits based on its finding that the claimant for such benefits did not leave his or her employment for good cause include: Avoid disciplinary action: Claimant’s election to accept the employer’s offer of an “early retirement package” instead of facing a scheduled disciplinary hearing for alleged misconduct, [Williams v NYC General Services, 256… [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:57 am by Stephen Bilkis
As Held in People v Costello, the law may seek to legislate morality, but it must do so without offending the constitutional protections of the due process clause and the right of privacy. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Costello, ruled that Turner did not have displacement rights over Short as Short had more permanent service in the relevant civil division -- the Town of Ulster. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
  He’s in the cast of State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:32 am by Darius Whelan
 Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Jack Martone
On January 11, the Court heard oral arguments in Roberts v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Tejada v Jonas, 17 AD3d 448; Sanchez v City of New York, 305 AD2d 487). [read post]