Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin" Results 121 - 140 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a) requires that the records sought be "reasonably described," an agency denying a FOIL request for lack of a reasonable description "bears the burden to establish that the descriptions were insufficient for purposes of locating and identifying the documents sought" (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York State Police, 207 AD3d 971, 974 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Konigsberg… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a) requires that the records sought be "reasonably described," an agency denying a FOIL request for lack of a reasonable description "bears the burden to establish that the descriptions were insufficient for purposes of locating and identifying the documents sought" (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York State Police, 207 AD3d 971, 974 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Konigsberg… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
This was demonstrated in the Appellate Division’s ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
Citing Griffin v Coughlin, 88 NY2d 674, the Appellate Division pointed out that “[t]here is no firmer or more settled principle of Establishment Clause jurisprudence than that prohibiting the use of the State’s power to force one to profess a religious belief. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 8:35 am by Ronald Mann
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
"Sometimes a resignation is claimed to have been coerced from an employee or obtained from the employee under duress.The courts have concluded that where an appointing authority has the right, if not the duty, to take disciplinary action against an individual, "it was not duress to threaten to do what one had the legal right to do" [see Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643]. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm by Josh Blackman
S., at ___–___ (GORSUCH, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (slip op., at 5–8); Coughlin v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm by Amy Howe
Coughlin (April 24): Whether the Bankruptcy Code unequivocally expresses Congress’s intent to abrogate the sovereign immunity of Native American tribes. [read post]