Search for: "DIAMOND V. U.S. " Results 121 - 140 of 630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As a result, the relator’s burden to prove the tax obligation required proof that the taxpayer had a tax collection and remittance obligation (or nexus) under Illinois tax law that would not offend U.S. commerce clause nexus principles.9 While proving attributional nexus is an arduous factual task, the additional requirement to prove that the taxpayer acted with a “knowing” mental intent significantly increases the relator’s difficulty in proving a FCA violation. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   Even in Chapter Two -- where I unapologetically set out the sophisticated constitutional theory advanced in the postwar era by political scientists/philosophers like Willmoore Kendall, Martin Diamond, and Harry V. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 379, 102 S.Ct. 1114, 71 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982). [read post]
22 May 2019, 10:00 pm
” Together, these changes, if enacted, will bring us back to the 1980 Supreme Court decision in Diamond v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
”    The court notes that in Williams, in the Confrontation Clause context, the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Prometheus Labs., Inc., 566 U.S. 66, 70–71 (2012) (citing Diamond v.Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 185 (1981)).To determine whether a patent claims ineligible subject matter, the Supreme Court has established a two-stepframework. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am by Jonathan Holbrook
This topic garnered some national attention a few years ago, when the U.S. [read post]