Search for: "DISTRICT VENUES LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 10:00 am by Audrey A Millemann
  The Northern District of California was the proper venue for the cases. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The parties do not dispute that Stores operates retail locations in the District, and whether venue is proper as to Stores is not at issue in this appeal. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:18 am by Matthew Schutte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the Eastern District of Texas’ partial grant of Victoria’s Secret Stores LLC, Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management Inc, and Victoria’s Secret Direct Brand Management’s (the Defendants) motion to dismiss Andra Group, LP’s (Andra’s) patent infringement suit for improper venue. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:18 am by Matthew Schutte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the Eastern District of Texas’ partial grant of Victoria’s Secret Stores LLC, Victoria’s Secret Stores Brand Management Inc, and Victoria’s Secret Direct Brand Management’s (the Defendants) motion to dismiss Andra Group, LP’s (Andra’s) patent infringement suit for improper venue. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:59 am by Dennis Crouch
Under the statute for patent litigation venue, venue is proper in a judicial district if either (1) the defendant is incorporated in the district or (2) the defendant infringes within the district and also has a “regular and established places of business” in the district. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:50 am by Adam Levitin
Delaware is the other, but it only provides for divisive merger for LLCs. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
Step 2: the services file motions to transfer to Northern District of California based on the mandatory venue clauses in their TOSes. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am by Dennis Crouch
 [T]he district court disregarded the pre-litigation acts by Ikorongo Tech and Ikorongo Texas aimed at manipulating venue. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Eileen McDermott
The CAFC explained that the district court erred in failing to consider pre-litigation tactics by Ikorongo Technology LLC (Ikorongo Tech) and Ikorongo Texas LLC aimed at... [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Eileen McDermott
The CAFC explained that the district court erred in failing to consider pre-litigation tactics by Ikorongo Technology LLC (Ikorongo Tech) and Ikorongo Texas LLC aimed at purposely manipulating venue in the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm by Robert McLellarn and Steven Gersten
  Generally, the automatic stay requires a party seeking relief against a debtor to do so in, and only in, the bankruptcy court, which can provide the relief sought or grant permission to pursue claims and rights in another venue. [read post]
28 May 2021, 12:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
The relevant cases all have the same basic facts: the patentee, a North Carolina LLC called Ikorongo Technology, created a Texas LLC and assigned the Texas LLC the right to several patents only in certain counties in Texas, including counties in the Western District. [read post]