Search for: "David V. Arnold"
Results 121 - 140
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
In BMW v Round and Metal, to which David's article refers, Arnold J, in a judgment that epitomises the adjective "Arnoldian", rejected the proposition that the defendant's alloy wheels fell within the scope of the repair clause: they were sold not as straight replacements but as alternatives, with different dimensions - and tellingly they were usually supplied in sets of four. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
After that elevation, her portfolio still includes Litigation Section III–run by a lawyer named David C. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] | Innovation & IPRs in China & India: Book Review | Paris Tribunal rejects request to filter 'torrent' searches on Bing | Red colour mark reinstated in Germany | Update on Napp v Dr Reddy & Sandoz Litgation | Patent jurisdiction tussle in Rhodia v Molycorp | Decision on ISP liability from Rome | Copyright in the Animal… [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:40 pm
* Mr Justice Arnold rejects bid to hear infringement of German designation in Rhodia v Molycorp patent jurisdiction tussleAmerikat Annesley Merelle Ward explains why Mr Justice Arnold rejected a claim to consider infringement of a German designation in Rhodia v Molycorp. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
| Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm
The class action Carter v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
ITMA opens the lid on Trunki David Brophy brings you the news from ITMA's panel discussion on the practical implications of the Trunki decision (courtesy of Lydia Birch and David Coldham of Gowlings). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:19 am
” Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 14 February] – Indigenous IP | Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic London black cab | Life of a national/EU trade mark ... in a map | A comprehensive… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
Mark has some ideas about that.* Of Mice and Men: Regeneron v KymabAs David's post on Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) clearly shows, mice have a very special relation with patent case law. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
Abuse: The judge noted that following the decision of Mr Justice Briggs (as he then was) in Sectorguard Plc v Dienne Plc [2009] EWHC 2693 (Ch) the pursuit of any litigation must be proportionate. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
| New Patent Act in Spain | Yellow as a trade mark in Australia | Innovation is the dirty little secret of IP | David Keltie. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
David Caine (Arnold & Porter) argued the case for TriReme while Peter Armenio (Quinn Emanuel) represented AngioScore. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 82 [week ending on Sunday 24 January] – Economics of legal professions | One shot to boost your EU trade marks | AG's opinion on fair compensation | Enforcement Directive consultation and UPC | Armonised grace period | Draft UK Legislation on Unitary Patent and Unified Patents Court | Arnold J's ruling in KitKat | Linking and copyright | GE moves to Boston.Never too late 81 [week ending… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
The floor goes to Darren.* Arnold J rules that shape of KitKat chocolate bar cannot be registered as a trade markFollowing a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) [here and here], the famous KitKatcase got back to the High Court of England and Wales, where Arnold J tried to apply the ambiguous guidelines of the CJEU – and wondered how the latter has not really got the questions he had posed. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] – Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
The US Register of Copyrights, the EU Commissioner for the Digital Economy & Society, the Canadian Government, High Court Judge Sir Richard Arnold, the Pirate Party, and other commentators too numerous to mention individually, have all advanced the need for reform of this most complicated of the various IP disciplines. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
In House v. [read post]
