Search for: "Davidson v. Davidson" Results 121 - 140 of 911
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
Zazzle * Trademark Injunction Issued Against Print-on-Demand Website–Harley Davidson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 5:40 pm
Reasonable minds might disagree about whether Judge Ikuta's opinion is correct or whether Judge Christen's dissent has the better of the argument.Regardless, one can't help but leave the opinions with a firm sense that Judge Klausner entered the procedural orders he did here (e.g., denying stipulated agreements to extend a super-rapid class certification deadline) with a firm eye towards making sure that the class never got certified.Whether that's a case-specific preference or… [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:18 am by Eric Goldman
Zazzle * Trademark Injunction Issued Against Print-on-Demand Website–Harley Davidson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
  So even though federal court might generally be preferable in a lot of cases, you'd want to think deeply about it in any particular case, especially a class action.Here, you've got a defendant (Harley-Davidson) who removed the case under CAFA, saw the federal judge remand the case back to state court, and then filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit to keep it in federal court. [read post]