Search for: "Davies v. United Fire "
Results 121 - 140
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
Moreover, it is hard to see how this particular prescriptive comity doctrine survives the Supreme Court’s later decisions in Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 10:03 am
At around 3 p.m. that day, the local Chief Ranger of the Bulloch County GFC fire protection unit received notice of a fire on that property. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
” … LPL fired Bennie at the beginning of November 2010. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The Relationships between Speech and Conduct, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, 2016, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 16-16, Jane R. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Yesterday, the United States and Saudi Arabia announced their new united front when it comes to sanctioning terrorist organizations. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
United States, 133 S. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
” The Associated Press has the latest on the proposed cease-fire. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
Ct. 280; United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
The case, Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
” In the denial of the cellphone tower data case (Davis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 5:50 am
” Hawkins v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
And indeed, that is precisely the case that is presented by the Kentucky clerk: "Davis cannot be fired because she is an elected official. [read post]
