Search for: "Davis v. Cross" Results 121 - 140 of 788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm by Giles Peaker
Davies v Scott, 24 October 2019,  Mayors & City County Court . [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm by Giles Peaker
Davies v Scott, 24 October 2019,  Mayors & City County Court . [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Without any substantial analysis, however, the court gave its own ipse dixit that the existence vel non of confounding was an issue for cross-examination and the jury’s resolution.[14] Whether there was a reasonably valid association between PDE5i and melanoma was a jury question. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
It affirmed the order granting respondent’s cross-motion for interim counsel fees to the extent of awarding her $200,000. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
It focuses on the procedure and rules of evidence for the trial of a New York matrimonial action or custody case, and contains questions for the examination and cross-examination of witnesses.Recent LegislationLaws of 2019, Ch 523, enacted and effective November 20, 2019, amended Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236[B](5-a) (b)(5) and Domestic Relations Law § 236[B](6)(b)(4)  Laws of 2019, Ch 523, enacted and effective November 20, 2019, amended the… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Although Homes became more reserved, he remained engaged in his academic and extra-curricular life; he played trumpet in middle school, ran for his cross-country team, and played both football and soccer. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:21 am by Robert Black
It identified only two situations in which such a cause of action does not exist: first, if “special factors counsel hesitation in the absence of affirmative action by Congress,” (see also Davis v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:23 am by John Jascob
., Mondelez Global LLC filed responses to the CFTC’s filing, which similarly were under seal and unavailable to the public (CFTC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
The critical essays accompanying the text are eclectic, cross-disciplinary, and incisive, and they include contributions from beyond the academy, such as the essays by science fiction authors Elizabeth Bear and Cory Doctorow. [read post]